For further information click here
Please don’t hesitate to contact our expert team on 01435 866011 for further innovative engineering solutions.
TFC Talks Smalley: Spirolox Retaining Rings & Nested Wave Springs Q&A
Debbie Annets
Debbie Annets
Debbie joined TFC in July 2003, progressing from stock taking to Despatch, Inspection, and Technical Sales in 2013. Known for her attention to detail, organization, and product knowledge, Debbie excels in key account handling, purchasing, KPI completions, and bespoke design, providing exceptional customer engagement and understanding their needs.
~Expert answers on maximum turns and design differences~
Welcome back to Smalley Talk, where our engineers answer commonly asked retaining ring and wave spring design questions. This week, Debbie Annets fields some questions about Spirolox retaining rings and nested wave springs.
What is the maximum number of turns for a nested wave spring? Can loads still be toleranced with this many turns?
There is not a specific maximum number of turns for a nested spring, but every application is different. A nested spring with many turns may work for one project, but not for another. On springs with a very high spring rate, such as a nested spring, it can be more difficult to tolerance the loads. Minor changes in the wire thickness or free height in the spring from lot to lot can have a dramatic impact on the loads. Our Engineering team will review all new spring designs and discuss our capabilities with you.
What are the differences between internal and external Spirolox retaining rings?
Retaining rings are designed to cling in a groove. On shaft rings, the inside diameter is used while on housing rings, the outside diameter is used. The rings are dimensioned and toleranced so that they have the appropriate amount of grip in the respective groove. The end configurations will be different for shaft rings and housing rings to help facilitate the removal of the ring.